Also benefited greatly from an 80k advisor call!
We provide research and support to help people move into careers that effectively tackle the world’s most pressing problems. We currently provide four main programmes to achieve this:
Our website – We’ve written a career guide, dozens of cause area problem profiles, and reviews of impactful career paths. In 2023, we had just over 5.5 million visits to our website and our research newsletter went out to more than 400,000 subscribers.
Our podcast – We host in-depth conversations about the world’s most pressing problems and how people can use their careers to solve them. In 2023, we had over 290,000 hours of listening time on our podcast.
Our job board – We maintain a curated list of promising opportunities for impact and career capital on our job board. In 2023, we listed over 5,000 roles and had over 780,000 clickthroughs from our job board to job ads for open roles.
Our one-on-one service – In 2023, we had one-on-one calls with over 1,500 people to work through their career uncertainties and connect them with domain experts. Our headhunting service recommended promising candidates for more than 100 impactful roles in 2023.
Our goal is to get talented people working on the world’s most pressing problems. We focus on problems that threaten the long-term future, including risks from artificial intelligence and catastrophic pandemics.
To achieve our goal, we:
Reach people who might be interested through marketing, engaging and user-friendly content, and word-of-mouth.
Introduce people to information, frameworks, and ideas which are useful for having a high-impact career and help them get excited about contributing to solving pressing global problems.
Support people in transitioning to careers that contribute to solving pressing global problems.
We’re fundraising for our general budget, which covers all our spending except paid marketing and grantmaking. You can see our 2024 budget here.
We’ve already filled our fundraising needs for H1 2024, so any funding received would go towards our fundraising efforts for H2 2024 and 2025. In this period, we expect to continue with the delivery of our programmes, explore how we can continue to improve and grow them, and consolidate our org strategy and future plans. We’re also exploring starting a new video programme.
You can see our full team here. Niel Bowerman is our CEO.
We recommend you check out our track record here – this covers measures of impact including plan changes, placements to impactful roles, and data from the EA survey and Open Philanthropy’s survey.
You could also review our repository of historical organisation evaluations.
80k is now in its 14th year.
It seems like we’ll continue in our mission to provide research and support to help people move into high-impact careers in some form.
There are many possible specific answers to the questions of causes and outcomes if this project fails, which would vary by programme. But in general terms:
We might conclude the ways we’re pursuing our mission isn’t the best approach, in which case we’d decide to change how we direct our attention.
We might learn that some part of our work isn’t justifying its costs (opportunity and financial), in which case we’d de-emphasise or economise that part of our approach.
We might fail to fundraise, in which case we’d put much larger efforts into fundraising, deprioritise growth, and scale down.
We might conclude that our approach to some issues could cause harm. There are many potential candidates for concern here. For a sense of these you could review our mistakes page, some of Ben Todd’s thoughts post-FTX, our article on working at frontier AI labs, surveys of our negative effects on our users (for example, see the Open Phil survey, the EA survey, or the 80k user surveys from 2020 and 2022), or consider your own concerns about how the worldview and communities that 80k introduces people to could lead them to cause harm.
We could fail to act sufficiently quickly or effectively enough to make an important difference to pressing problems.
You can see our donors here.
Our largest donor is Open Philanthropy, but we value being able to support ourselves with a range of funding sources and are excited to grow our network of donors.
Michaël Rubens Trazzi
4 months ago
Offering a token of appreciation since I learned a lot reading 80k's blog, listening to Rob Wiblin or doing a coaching call. Same as Neel, donating a small amount as token of appreciation, since this is already a large org,
Matthew Cameron Farrugia-Roberts
4 months ago
When prompted to think about community projects that have had a positive impact on my career, 80,000 Hours is always the first thing that comes to mind. Their career guide, problem profiles, and long-form podcast were really valuable when I was reflecting on which direction to take my career in. My career coach Huon has also offered me valuable support and resources since our initial call. I'm sure many others in the community can point to 80KH as a positive influence on their career. I think it meets the goals of the EA Community Choice funding program to recognise and reward 80KH's history of impactful community contributions and I am glad to be a small part of that.
Nina Friedrich
4 months ago
I have learned a lot from the 80,000 Hours podcast and have shared various episodes with others. Thank you for doing these!
Neel Nanda
4 months ago
I think 80K is doing good work that should clearly be funded - I've had 80K career advising several times and found it quite valuable, and think it helped push me over the edge into pursuing AI Safety work (not donating more as I think they're far too large an org to get much value from EACC, and it's best spent on smaller orgs)
Jess Binksmith
4 months ago
@3af9cd28-21c9-4c05-9a60-dd48a83af1f2 Thanks for flagging! We do have some resources to help people learn about and find animal-welfare focused roles, and recently updated our factory farming problem profile (which is why this was on my mind). But I agree it's an area we focus less on than other cause areas, so I've removed the tag.
Holly Morgan
4 months ago
@Jess Fyi when you up/downvote a project, the system takes your cursor to the comments box and asks you why you just did that—there's a good chance this comment was responding to that question with apologies (rather than being like "Err, what? Sorry, how on earth does this have anything to do with farm animals?")
Holly Morgan
4 months ago
(Also I just applause-emojied your comment for the new factory farming profile and then undid in case you thought I was applausing removing the tag. Not sure what the other applause is for!)
Dusan D Nesic
4 months ago
I would not be doing as impactful of a job if not for an 80k call ~3 years ago.
Elaine Perlman
4 months ago
Super project to help people focus on the most urgent issues. Longtime fan.