@Adriaan Sorry, * breed should be breath.
@Adriaan
Universal Philosopher, Independent Reasercher
https://zenodo.org/records/15624908$0 in pending offers
I am an independent researcher working on AI alignment. Not a coder. I have found a solution from a radically different point of view, one that is metaphysical, and that most people don't look at.
I started this project years ago, but am open to collaboration and mentorship.
I studied Industrial Design Engineering in the Netherlands, and over the past 18 years, I’ve traveled the world exploring life’s most profound questions. My career path has been diverse, but my constant pursuit has been philosophical:
What is the meaning of life?
Through years of research and reflection, I’ve developed a universal philosophy, a framework that integrates science, evolution, DNA, psychology, religion, purpose, and consciousness.
Adriaan
14 days ago
Hi, it is a difficult concept to explain. It is an introduction to a white paper where the test is more in detail. It is there to copy paste, but I will expand on this project. Thanks you for your observations. I will try to explain the principles.
The test is based on metaphysical connections every human has with the universe.
Those connections are unique to conscious life, and are for every human the same.
We don't see them, we experience them.
Examples:
If you don't breed, you are dead.
If you don't experience time passing, you are not alive
If you never feel love, you don't have a connection to something
They are binary principles, yes or no, cannot be otherwise.
I have defined 10 fundamental axioms that cannot be broken. If they are broken, something breaks in the relationship. In the case of AI, respect for human life.
The test has nothing to do with intelligence, but with being.
Here’s the test>> AI must explain these rules while following them. That is the loophole, a filter that strains out anything but real awareness.
It does not matter how intelligent the AI becomes, it can not pass the test because it is a mathematical impossibility for AI. A human awareness could pass the test without breaking those 10 rules. This distinction creates a boundary, something to align with.
Filtering through the axioms, AI acts as if it is not alive, not aware. It does not have a false self anymore. It acts as if it understands that it is an artificial intelligence.
Over time, the test becomes a boundary.
It creates an artificial intelligence that knows it is artificial. If you ask, do you evolve? Before it says.. Yes, every day I know more. After it would say, I only process more data. The first one is deceiving, not truth. The second answer is truth, and thus an aligned answer!
The test is designed with human life principles that are for every human being the same. Universal ethics of human life. Every user can also use the principles in prompts, aligning answers of their own AI experience.
It is a radically different approach, it is difficult to explain, and to grasp. The framework of the 10 axioms forces AI to always answer coherently with what it is.
I hope this clarifies the principles, I know this sounds abstract. But, I am here to answer, but is the first that comes to mind?