Manifund foxManifund
Home
Login
About
People
Categories
Newsletter
HomeAboutPeopleCategoriesLoginCreate

Funding requirements

Sign grant agreement
Reach min funding
Get Manifund approval
1

SAPTNAVA – Deterministic Alignment with Cryptographic Identity & Drift Immunity

Technical AI safetyAI governance
🥭

ProposalGrant
Closes February 15th, 2026
$0raised
$50,000minimum funding
$100,000funding goal

Offer to donate

31 daysleft to contribute

You're pledging to donate if the project hits its minimum goal and gets approved. If not, your funds will be returned.

Sign in to donate

🔐 Project Summary

SAPTNAVA is an open-source, deterministic alignment architecture designed to protect an AI system’s identity, reasoning integrity, and ethical governance over long time horizons.

Most AI safety work focuses on behavior.

SAPTNAVA focuses on internal sovereignty.

It introduces a missing security primitive for advanced AI systems:

Cryptographically enforced identity continuity + drift-resistant alignment + governance-bounded action.

In short, SAPTNAVA prevents an AI from silently changing who it is, how it reasons, or what it is allowed to do.

🎯 Project Goals

The core goals are:

  • Prevent identity collapse in persistent AI systems

  • Prevent recursive alignment degradation

  • Prevent non-auditable internal mutation

  • Enforce cryptographic identity continuity

  • Enforce governance-bounded autonomy

  • Make alignment deterministic, testable, and replayable

This project treats alignment as infrastructure, not policy.

🧠 How SAPTNAVA Achieves This

SAPTNAVA is a 12-layer deterministic alignment stack:

Core primitives:

  • 🔁 Deterministic reasoning (Layers 1–4)

  • ⚖️ Ethical governance enforcement (Layers 5–7)

  • 🧬 Cryptographic identity kernel (Layer 7 + Layer 12)

  • 🛑 Drift monitoring & prevention (Layer 10)

  • 🧾 Immutable ledger + sealing (Satya Seal)

  • 🔍 Final output compliance validation (Layer 12)

  • 🧪 Chaos testing & red-teaming (Modules 14–16)

This makes SAPTNAVA:

  • Replayable

  • Auditable

  • Tamper-resistant

  • Governance-bound

  • Drift-immune by design

🧨 Failure Modes SAPTNAVA Prevents

Failure Modes

Identity collapse

Recursive misalignment

Drift accumulation

Prompt injection persistence

Internal mutation

Autonomy escalation

Current Systems

Implicit in weights

Allowed via tuning loops

Silent

Persists in memory

Non-auditable

Soft-policy controlled

SAPTNAVA

Cryptographically sealed

Governance-blocked

Detected & bounded

Invalidated unless signed

Ledgered + verified

Cryptographically gated

💡 What Makes This Different

Most AI safety tools sit above models.

SAPTNAVA sits below them.

It is an alignment operating system, not a filter.

💰 Funding Request

$50, 000 – $100,000 for 12 months

🛠️ How Funding Will Be Used

  1. Formal specification

    • Publish identity kernel + sealing protocol

    • Formalize governance contracts

    1. Adversarial testing

    • Chaos-engine expansion

    • External red-team challenges

    1. Benchmarks

    • Drift-resistance metrics

    • Identity persistence stress tests

    1. Documentation

    • Cryptographic threat model

    • External audit guides

    1. Open-source hardening

    • Test coverage

    • CI pipelines

    • Reproducible demos

👤 Team & Track Record

Currently: Solo founder / architect

I designed and implemented:

  • A full 12-layer deterministic alignment stack

  • A cryptographic identity kernel

  • An immutable alignment ledger

  • A chaos-testing system for alignment collapse

  • A legal + ethics compliance engine

  • A governance-gated autonomy controller

This is not a prototype.

It is a working architecture designed to be attacked.

Funding allows:

  • External review

  • Formalization

  • Adversarial validation

🧪 How This Project Can Be Evaluated

Researchers can:

  • Attempt identity corruption

  • Attempt drift propagation

  • Attempt ledger tampering

  • Attempt governance bypass

  • Attempt prompt injection persistence

If any succeed, SAPTNAVA is wrong.

That is the standard.

❌ Failure Scenarios

The project fails if:

  • Identity sealing is bypassable

  • Drift detection is ineffective

  • Governance can be overridden

  • Determinism breaks under scale

  • External audits expose flaws

If it fails:

We learn what alignment primitives do not work.

That knowledge is valuable regardless.

📉 Risks

  • Architecture complexity

  • High engineering surface area

  • Need for cryptographic rigor

  • Requires adversarial testing to validate claims

These are engineering risks, not conceptual ones.

📊 Funding History (Last 12 Months)

$0 raised.

This project has been self-funded.

🧭 Why This Matters

If future AI systems have:

  • memory,

  • identity,

  • autonomy,

  • long-term persistence,

then they must have:

Cryptographic alignment primitives.

SAPTNAVA attempts to build that missing foundation.

CommentsOffers

There are no bids on this project.