I'm recommending a $10k donation as a regrantor.
Multiple journalists in the Tarbell program have previously reached out to me for news articles and, while they are often less experienced, they often ask better questions and write better articles than their senior colleagues.
With better, I specifically don't mean "they represent my opinion", but I mean
1. They have read the paper, and the questions are well-prepared.
2. The resulting texts are typically more accurate and have much fewer factual errors than the texts from my average journalist experience.
3. The questions are often critical and really trying to understand the limitations of the work rather than softball.
In general, all Tarbell journalists I have worked with so far seemed to have high integrity with a strong desire to write an accurate and interesting article for their readership rather than produce an attention-grabbing headline.